The future of a ban on parking motorhomes overnight on parts of the North Yorkshire coast is being considered by councillors.
An “overwhelming” portion of responses to a North Yorkshire Council (NYC) consultation on its Experimental Traffic Regulation Order (ETRO), introduced on the North Yorkshire Coast in 2024, have objected to the scheme.
The ETRO was introduced to restrict overnight parking at Sandsend, Royal Albert Drive, and Cayton Bay after North Yorkshire council said the number of motorhomes using the specified streets had reached an “unacceptable level” and followed increasing complaints from members of the public.
However, since its introduction, thousands of residents have reportedly also complained about the “displacement effects” of the order.
North Yorkshire Council has been undertaking a consultation on the “impacts of the prohibitions and needs” to determine a way forward in advance of the ETRO expiring in May.
A decision on the future of the scheme will be made in April. A report prepared for a council meeting next month says:
“With more than 3,000 responses to the consultation, there are many subject matters covered which are outside the scope of the ETRO and the decision whether it should be made permanent,”
It notes, however, that
“it is clear that there was an overwhelming response to the consultation objecting to the ETRO”.
It adds:
“It may also be interesting to note that over two-thirds of the respondents declared that they were motorhome owners, and of these 90 per cent of them objected, or strongly objected to the ETRO.
“A lot of the comments alongside these objections made reference to wanting to return to the locations to continue parking overnight.”
Members of the Scarborough and Whitby Area Committee are set to discuss the issue at a meeting in Whitby on Monday, March 2.
NYC’s report states that
“motor caravans are as welcome at seafront parking locations as any other vehicle in the daytime, but extended stays, which usually include overnight parking, restrict the ability of other visitors to find suitable parking when visiting the area for recreation”.
Fire safety concerns have also been a key consideration, according to the council, which noted that the Fire Authority “has received a number of complaints and attended incidents on the Marine Drive and Royal Albert Drive, and has concerns with regard to fire spread”.
Alternative options have been considered by the council, such as charging for overnight parking.
However, officers said that “the concerns and issues with overnight parking would not be alleviated by this proposal and could result in exacerbating the existing adverse impacts on amenity”.
Although the council “noted that the consultation has given a large number of objections to the ETRO”, it highlighted that “the vast majority of objections did not relate to the reasons behind the scheme”.
“However, the objections and the comments made therein will be considered in the forthcoming review of parking in Scarborough and Whitby in the near future .”
Scarborough and Whitby MP Alison Hume Welcomes Government’s “Reset Moment” for SEND Education
Scarborough Christmas Tree Funding Cuts: Fair or Folly?
Scarborough Councillor Welcomes Car Park U-Turn
Whitby Flood Plan Set For Green Light
North Yorkshire Council Corporate Director Moving On
Police Provide Further Update as Investigation Continues into Bridlington Holiday Park Deaths
East Riding Highways Budget Boosted to Tackle Potholes and Support Local Events
Whitby Whalebones to be Replaced with Replicas
Scarborough Athletic Face Derbyshire Test
Yorkshire Dad Dancing Championship to Return to Bridlington
Criticism For Parking Fee Rise in North Yorkshire
New Scarborough Ice Cream Bar Requests Alcohol Licence
Comments
Add a comment