On Air Now

The Chill Out Zone

10:00pm - Midnight

  • 01723 336444

Now Playing

Hollies

He Ain't Heavy He's My Brother

Download

Pete Hegseth's news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answering

Thursday, 26 June 2025 19:13

By Michael Clarke, military analyst

Pete Hegseth's angry news conference, where the US defence secretary roundly abused those media outlets and individuals who didn't agree with him, certainly told us one thing.

That when reliable information eventually emerges from the battle damage assessment of the US attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant, it won't be accepted by everyone.

The whole issue has suddenly become politically toxic in Washington DC and will doubtless be fed into the spin dryer of vitriolic commentary and assertion that has been the most stand-out feature of this second Trump administration.

But what we did find out from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Dan Caine, was that the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs had been designed in some secrecy with exactly this sort of target in mind.

Trump-Iran live: US president reacts to Hegseth news conference

We also learned they all worked as per the test simulations, and that 12 were fired at six separate targets at Fordow and another two at a single target at the Natanz nuclear facility.

But the fierce argument over how to characterise the damage done in these attacks is really just a semantic spat. The two key questions are rather different.

Firstly, will the Iranians decide to give up their quest for a nuclear weapon as a result of this attack, as the Syrians did in 2007 when the Israelis destroyed their Al Kibar nuclear reactor?

Or else will they go hell for leather for a nuclear weapon, as Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did after the Israelis destroyed his nuclear reactor in 1981?

Read more:
Truth about success of US strikes lies deep underground
NATO chief refers to Trump as 'daddy'

And secondly, if the Iranians decide to go again for a nuclear weapon, how long will it be before they are back at the nuclear threshold, where they were less than a month ago?

Will it be within a year? Or five years? Or longer?

When we have an answer to those two questions, then we can put some real perspective on whether the US bombing has really been a success.

Sky News

(c) Sky News 2025: Pete Hegseth's news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answer

Did you find this article useful?

This is the Coast is committed to providing a daily local news service for the Yorkshire Coast. We are a small locally owned and operated business which employs professional journalists and reporters. We do not receive any public funding or grants and we are entirely funded by our local commercial operations. We enjoy fabulous support from local businesses who work with us on their advertising and marketing campaigns, but the cost of providing high quality, well researched, fact checked local news coverage is significant.

If you appreciate what This is the Coast does, and would like to help support our journalism, please consider supporting us on a monthly basis today.

A small contribution from all our readers would really help support independent journalism for the Yorkshire Coast.

More from Top Stories

Follow Us

Get Our Apps

Our Apps are now available for iOS, Android and Smart Speakers.

  • Available on the App Store
  • Available on Google Play
  • Just ask Amazon Alexa
  • Available on Roku

Today's Weather

  • Scarborough

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 21°C | Low: 13°C

  • Filey

    Sunny intervals

    High: 21°C | Low: 14°C

  • Whitby

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 22°C | Low: 14°C

  • Bridlington

    Sunny intervals

    High: 21°C | Low: 14°C

  • Hornsea

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 23°C | Low: 13°C

  • Driffield

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 22°C | Low: 13°C

News